Search for: "Long v. United States"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 20,241
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2008, 4:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 3:44 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:28 am
United States, where the US Attorney stretched a long way to prosecute a case as federal. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
Arabian American Oil Co. and Boureslan v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
The case involving a claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act is Sprint/United Management v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 10:19 am
The petition in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 12:02 pm
[Ed. note: I am counsel for the defendant in the second decision summarized here.]United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 8:23 am
Facts: This case (Przybysz v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 9:56 am
Facts: This case (Waldron v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 1:43 pm
No other state has voted to abolish capital punishment since the United States Supreme Court decision in Gregg v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
The Ruling in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:31 pm
The main educational paradigms in the United States are public school, private school, and home school. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
” The Ukrainian Ambassador to the United States is here tonight. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:27 pm
” Golan v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 2:35 pm
Erler immigrates to the United States and marries him. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 9:47 pm
So after six long years of procedural skirmishing and delays, all of these climate change lawsuits are back in state court–where they belong. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 5:33 pm
See Determination of Threatened Status for Bull Trout in the Coterminous United States, 64 Fed.Reg. 58,910 (Nov. 1, 1999). [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:25 am
(quoting United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:55 am
The ILC’s interpretation of the prosecute or extradite principle aligns with the reasoning of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the 2012 Belgium v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:07 pm
The United States Supreme Court agreed to review the case, and a unanimous Court agreed with the Sacketts that they were entitled to a hearing. [read post]
