Search for: "STATE v. SMITH"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 9,998
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
Moreover, there are no allegations related to breaching a promise to acehive a specific result, but only allegations about breaches of vague and non-specific (and somewhat boilerplate) provisions of the retainer agreement (see Mamoon v Dot Net Inc., 135 AD3d 656 [1st Dept 2016] citing Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose, 251 AD2d 3 5, 3 9 [1st Dept 1998] [ dismissing breach of contract claim as duplicative of legal malpractice claim where there were no allegations about a breach of… [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 2:22 pm
Smith, 454 F.3d 707 (U.S. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 11:02 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 3:06 pm
The en banc Fifth Circuit has ruled in Collins v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 7:44 am
State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 10:01 am
” See Pennock & Sellers v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 1:16 pm
(Kevin Smith had an especially thoughtful post on the suit earlier this summer.) [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
Valladolid, Greene v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Appx. 446 (6th Cir. 2010); Smith v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 2:40 pm
The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reached that conclusion concerning transgender status in Smith v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 pm
Moroney v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:19 pm
Mordenti v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
” South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:06 am
Now is the time for them to use examples like State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
The Ohio Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
EEOC and Golan v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
Child support -- Modification -- Administrative support order -- Trial court fundamentally erred when it reduced father's monthly child support obligations without notice or hearingDEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o Loretta Sermon, Cherral Smith, and Yata Frichelle Canty, Appellant, v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:26 am
The case is Smith v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 1:32 pm
With respect to Section 10.07(c), the Legislature's intent is demonstrated by the label - "civil" - given to the provision by the Legislature, the way in which the provision was codified, and the enforcement procedures it establishes, all identifiers of legislative intent as held in Smith v. [read post]
