Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 7,201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2009, 10:37 am
They justified this by saying that a license was a "privilege", not a "right" - and since the license holder had no rights, the state could do what it wanted. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 7:02 am
They justified this by saying that a license was a "privilege", not a "right" - and since the license holder had no rights, the state could do what it wanted. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:27 am
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 10:47 am
In IFC Credit Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:05 pm
Holder, deportation of taxpayers from the United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
Burndred v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:23 am
Related Cases: Oracle v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 1:15 pm
Our previews of the newest additions to the Illinois Supreme Court’s civil docket continue with Hadley v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
Walro v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 7:18 pm
Goliath v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 12:24 pm
Today the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its ruling in Case C‑583/12 Sintax [or, if you prefer, Syntax: the CJEU uses both spellings] Trading OÜ v Maksu- ja Tolliameti Põhja maksu- ja tollikeskus, a reference for a preliminary ruling from Estonia's Riigikohus. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 6:09 am
The amendment establishes a rebuttable presumption in favor of the right-holder as long as its name/pseudonym appears linked to the communication of the work to the public, which Microsoft was able to prove. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
The first 2 posts covered copyright and trade marks.As previously stated, the Africa IP Highlights 2022 is the result of collaboration between myself and and Doreen Adoma Agyei and Clarisse Mideva. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:58 am
We made the filing in Latif v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 11:06 am
The Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 12:01 am
It almost appears to be a ritual in standard-essential patent (SEP) disputes that the patent holder faults the implementer for hold-out while the accusation flying in the other direction is hold-up. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 3:39 am
If smartphone and tablet computers become immune to injunction requests only because they incorporate large numbers of features, a whole category of patents (with many subcategories) is devalued in the United States, forcing patent holders to rely on injunction-friendlier jurisdictions abroad.Judge Koh's decision was unprecedented and expected at the same time. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:47 pm
A justification that the discussion paper gives for this proposal is that Australia's obligations under its Free Trade Agreements with the United States, Singapore and South Korea require it to provide a legal incentive to ISPs to cooperate with rights holders to prevent infringement on their systems and networks. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:52 am
BASCA v Secretary of State for Innovation and Skills [2015] EWHC 1723 (Admin) [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:33 am
Indeed, Vogue was right and in fact today the Court of Appeal issued its decision in Fenty v Arcadia, confirming Birss J's judgment and holding that "the sale by Topshop of the t-shirt amounted to passing off. [read post]
