Search for: "State v. Washington"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 17,036
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Brown v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:57 am
Nevada v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 3:41 pm
Cook v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 5:09 am
Trump v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:47 am
Here is the abstract: After Washington v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 8:41 pm
By Mike Dorf The legalization of recreational marijuana by the states of Colorado and Washington does not change anything in principle from the status quo ante in which various states (including Colorado and Washington) had legalized medical marijuana. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:23 am
In Gull Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:21 am
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Division One Court of Appeals: State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 10:21 am
In Arista v. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [June 25, 2009]), the United States Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause requires that in order for the prosecution to be able to introduce a forensic laboratory report at trial, the prosecutor must present a live witness to testify to the truth of the statements made in the report subject to cross-examination. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
This week, the Ninth Circuit decided Stroman's v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 2:19 pm
Washington State Association of Counties (2011) and Telford v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 10:37 am
The first case of State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 3:36 pm
As stated by the court:Of critical importance to the issue of personal jurisdiction, [defendant's] attempts at "extra-judicial patent enforcement" were targeted at [the plaintiff's] business activities in Washington and can fairly be characterized as attempts to limit competition from [plaintiff] at the Seattle convention.These activities specifically directed at Washington rendered exercise of jurisdiction fair, and the court… [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 8:52 am
The Washington Court of Appeals (Division One) recently clarified the interpretation of Washington's "Notice to Lender" Statute, RCW 60.04.221, in Pacific Continental Bank v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:07 pm
Utah Power & Light Co. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 11:06 am
United States, 2017 U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:59 am
In Syeed v. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:12 am
It also held that RLUIPA does not authorize damage claims against officials in their individual capacities.In United States v. [read post]
