Search for: "Fields v. United States"
Results 4121 - 4140
of 5,229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2018, 3:37 am
He told Phillips that he wasn’t convinced that the court’s 1942 decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:38 am
Since 1984, the United States has only experienced ~12 years (30.8%) of unified government. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:03 am
Roe v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
Comparing WTO Panelists and ICSID Arbitrators: The Creation of International Legal Fields Jose Augusto Fontoura Costa Abstract: Who are people who make the decisions in trade and investment dispute settlement systems? [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:20 am
Or does the existence of inexpensive drones present a novel Fourth Amendment concern that will require a novel doctrine to address it, as the Supreme Court arguably charted new courses regarding GPS tracking in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 5:34 pm
Texas: A Texas Court of Appeals, in Drennen v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 9:16 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 9:00 am
Perhaps one day decisions like Citizens United v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
” And, as to lifetime detention of U.S. persons, the bill by its very terms (thanks to an amendment introduced by Senator Feinstein) confirms what would have been the proper reading anyway—namely, that its detention authorization provision (section 1021) does not “affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm
” And, as to lifetime detention of U.S. persons, the bill by its very terms (thanks to an amendment introduced by Senator Feinstein) confirms what would have been the proper reading anyway—namely, that its detention authorization provision (section 1021) does not “affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested… [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:51 pm
This well-settled principle is common to the United States and India. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am
Twenty years ago, a massive movement emerged in the United States rallying behind the populations at risk of genocide in Darfur. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 8:02 am
The Antitrust Subcommittee of the United States Senate will hold an app store hearing tomorrow. [read post]
13 May 2013, 11:39 am
CLS Bank International v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 2:56 pm
V. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:09 am
The trial judge uses something called the Daubert standard (in reference to a case called Daubert v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 11:38 pm
(This works the same way in the United States, by the way.)The actual economic impact of this enforcement on Apple remains to be seen. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:13 am
The landmark 1963 United States Supreme Court decision Brady v. [read post]
