Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 11,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2016, 7:51 am
Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 11:16 am
A few days after the plan was filed as a proposed initiative, the Hooker action was filed. [read post]
3 May 2009, 6:00 am
In Nijhawan v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 11:10 am
See County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:48 pm
District Court for the District of Nevada issued an order [pdf] in the case of Righthaven v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 5:39 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:14 pm
The reality is that too few legal marijuana dispensaries exist as it is because so many cities and counties – two-thirds of the state – have banned them. [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:00 pm
By now, however, most of the large firms who have anything interesting to say about Murphy v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm
McIntyre had very few contacts with New Jersey; although a distributor sold the machines in the United States, only four of them (at most) were located in New Jersey. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 10:16 am
Rethinking Clarance Thomas: "There are few articles of faith as firmly fixed in the liberal canon as the belief that Clarance Thomas is, to put it as bluntly as many liberals do, a dunce and a worm," notes Walter Russell Mead early in this piece from the American Interest. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm
Even in the few cases in which the court ruled against business interests, the downstream effects on business interests may not necessarily be negative in the aggregate. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:01 pm
That ruling was in a 1997 case, Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
NetChoice v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:48 pm
China and Google v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:38 am
Yesterday’s transcript in Betterman v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 1:19 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:45 pm
Justice Mclachlin’s dissent (as she was then) in Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 3:40 pm
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 10:29 pm
They don't make the decision, but both the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) presiding over the investigation and, ultimately, the Commission (the U.S. trade agency's top-level decision-making body) often find the staff's input useful.Discovery disputes between private parties are normal--and it's equally normal that companies being investigated or sued by antitrust enforcers dispute the scope of discovery requests (I've been watching that for a while now in United… [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:39 pm
Such a ruling can be predicted with reasonable assurance in only a few jurisdictions in the world – including India, strongly pro-moral rights, and the United States, strongly ambivalent, which both agree on the principle that destruction of a work should be prevented, in so far as possible, by artists’ moral rights. [read post]
