Search for: "STATE v. SMITH"
Results 4161 - 4180
of 10,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Echoing arguments by Theda Skocpol on Civil War pensions, DPADR argues that the various forms of debt relief offered by 19th-century state legislatures constituted a sort of proto-welfare state. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 12:20 am
Smith, (Docket No. 08-1351). [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 7:22 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 7:34 am
In Fulton v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
NYPPL Comments: In New York State, unless otherwise provided by a collective bargaining agreement or by statute, typically only incompetence or misconduct related to job performance or off-duty misconduct adversely reflecting on the public employer [see, for example, Smith v Kerick, 292 A.D.2d 223 and Wilburn v McMahon, 296 A.D.2d 805] may serve as a lawful basis for an appointing authority initiating disciplinary action against a public officer or employee. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 5:50 am
State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 11:16 pm
Rather, in Denedo, CAAF premised its assertion of jurisdiction on the All Writs Act.CAAF, in a 3-2 decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:13 am
The Facts of the Case In the recent case of Britton v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 3:14 pm
Smith, 77 Fla. 633, 82 So. 236, 236 (1919)). [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 10:02 am
This morning’s papers across the United States are covered with paralyzed, former dancer, Stephanie Smith’s battle against food giant, Cargill. [read post]
27 May 2022, 1:54 pm
Smith v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am
Likewise, the allegations of defamation failed to state a cause of action. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 5:32 am
Johnny Smith and the Assimilative Crimes Act • American Indian Law Journal [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am
In Pimlico Plumbers Ltd and Mullins v Smith [2018] UKSC 29, the Supreme Court held that the sole test in deciding whether someone is a worker is whether there is an obligation of personal performance. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:58 am
Smith, which explored whether a judge’s extensive commentary about evidence constitutes coercion of the jurors. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 7:08 am
Smith v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:28 pm
Carhart, and its decision earlier this summer in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:22 am
Smith v. [read post]
