Search for: "Akhil Amar"
Results 401 - 420
of 566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am
At Slate, Jordan Weissmann disputes Akhil Reed Amar’s op-ed in The New York Times, “A Liberal’s Case for Brett Kavanaugh,” in which Amar calls Kavanaugh’s nomination “Trump’s finest hour, his classiest move”; Weissmann contends that “in the post Merrick Garland era, in which nominations are clearly about pure power politics and little else, a piece like Amar’s at worst reeks of the amoral Ivy League… [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
The value of Professor Amar’s article was to show how landmark cases built on the principle and how it could generate further insights.Yet Professor Amar recognized that one can take intratextualism too far. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
This blog featured post-argument commentary on the case from Roger Clegg, Ellen Katz, and Abigail Thernstrom, as well as an academic highlight by Amanda Frost that focuses on Akhil Amar’s recent essay online at the Harvard Law Review. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 9:24 pm
Those scholars who have addressed the changed language of Section One, such as Akhil Amar, have explained the change as reflecting a desire to follow the drafting advice of John Marshall in Barron v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:09 am
Into this unmitigated disaster of price gouging and lack of regulatory oversight, enter Yale Law School professors Akhil Reed Amar and Ian Ayres (who taught Lat constitutional law and contracts, respectively). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
Akhil Amar went justice by justice to explain why it was credible for each one to side with him, in an especially detailed and vivid example of Supreme Court fan fiction. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
Pushaw and I go back to the early years of our careers when Akhil Amar put us in touch to discuss works in progress. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 5:55 am
As Vikram Amar, Akhil Amar, and Stephen Calabresi (a co-Founder of the Federalist Society) put it in their striking brief: “Miserably. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 5:31 am
by Michael C. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:35 pm
In the Slaughter-House Cases (1873), the Court interpreted the Privileges or Immunities Clause to provide no protection against state or local infringement of constitutional rights, but, as Akhil Amar has noted, "[v]irtually no serious modern scholar-left, right, and center-thinks that this is a plausible reading of the Amendment. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 12:01 am
’ Yale Law School professor Akhil Reed Amar offers this assessment of Bingham’s contribution: ‘It was Bingham’s generation that in effect added a closing parenthesis after the first eight . . . amendments, distinguishing these amendments from all others. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
" But can it be plausibly argued, as Dean Eastman and perhaps Akhil Amar suggest, that there is another view of originalism in play as well? [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 12:00 am
” In the same publication, Jeremy Waldron reviews Akhil Reed Amar’s The Constitution Today: Timeless Lessons for the Issues of Our Era, which argues that the “Constitution has to be both timeless and timely. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
Hunter's Lessee and revived (and tweaked) by Akhil Amar in a 1985 article. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:00 am
In addition to his narrow critique of progressive opponents of originalism, Solum’s post offers a capsule history tracing progressive originalism from Frederick Douglass through Justice Hugo Black to Akhil Amar, Jack Balkin, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 7:30 pm
Akhil Amar has a famous law review article on what he calls intratextualism relating to the US Constitution. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
They lurk behind our debates on how to best understand the Constitution, and they largely turn on unwritten ideas.For similar reasons, Professor Akhil Amar wrote a book titled "America's Unwritten Constitution," and Professor Laurence Tribe authored a book titled "The Invisible Constitution. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 1:32 pm
Akhil Amar and Jonathan Marcus wrote a thoughtful article on the retrial of previously acquitted defendants in the 1995 Columbia Law Review. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Rather, Mitchell's "President is not an officer of the United States" gambit relies on a hyper-formalistic version of what Professor Akhil Amar has called intra-textualism that renders the Constitution a kind of secret decoder ring. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:15 am
Akhil Amar and Rob Natelson have written more extensively on this.) [4.] [read post]
