Search for: "Arnold v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,384
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2014, 1:22 pm
The case is Lake Environmental, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 11:15 am
Norris catching up on IPKat after some hard partyingphoto credit: https://www.learningliftoff.comPatentWhen Shakespeare wrote "something is rotten in the state of Denmark," he might have very well been describing the Danish court system in 2019. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 7:09 am
Yesterday, the Sixth Circuit granted en banc review in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 7:47 am
Since the landmark 2014 decision of Arnold J in Cartier [here, here, here] (currently under appeal: the appeal will be heard on 13 April) it appears that indeed this type of measure is also available to trade mark owners.IPKat readers will remember that the reason why this was uncertain is because - unlike what happened in relation to Article 8(3) of the InfoSoc Directive (transposed into UK law through the adoption of s97A of the Copyright Designs and… [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:25 am
Source: ACLU v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:25 am
Source: ACLU v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:51 pm
”Contrary to the content and tone of Nunez’s letter, the probation report states Nunez lied when first contacted by police, was “never cooperative,” and after his arrest and release sent a text message to a codefendant stating, 'Gangster rap made us do it lol.'"Dude. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 4:42 am
In order to succeed on a claim for accounting malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate a departure from accepted standards of practice and that the departure was a proximate cause of injury (see Alskom Realty, LLC v Baranik, 189 AD3d 745, 747; Kristina Denise Enters., Inc. v Arnold, 41 AD3d 788, 789). [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:46 pm
ARNOLD. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 8:37 am
Affirmed.Case Name: GILBERT ORTIZ, JR. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:54 am
ASKIN v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 9:28 am
However, the Court also states (“superfluously”) that even if this would have been the case the Court’s conclusion would remain the same. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 11:07 am
On February 20, 2008, in an 8-1 decision, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Preston v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 6:06 am
’State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
Arnold. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 2:48 pm
Homeland Security Investigations and US Attorneys' offices did just that in Operation Mummy's Curse, which involved the case of United States v. [read post]
