Search for: "Barrett v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 1,088
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
And it cannot prevent Congress from determining who the rightful electors are and discharging its exclusive responsibility to say who will serve as the next President of the United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
This is a Norwich Pharmacal order, named for the case in which it was first granted (see Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); see also The Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd [2013] 1 All ER 928, [2012] 1 WLR 3333, [2012] UKSC 55 (21 November 2012)), and the Supreme Court has affirmed that it forms part of Irish law (see Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497; Ryanair… [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:20 pm by Josh Blackman
And one month later, a cert petition was filed in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:53 am by Andrew Weissmann
United States  suffers from shallow reasoning, lack of historical support, and distortion of legal precedent. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
United States, Sarah Friedman on  Hansberry v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:36 am by SHG
United States, they’ve got some decisions to make. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 6:36 am
  The conflict around the suitability of Amy Coney Barrett, then, reflects  the way law is now understood as the expression of a striving for (eternal?) [read post]