Search for: "Barrett v. United States"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,088
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm
And it cannot prevent Congress from determining who the rightful electors are and discharging its exclusive responsibility to say who will serve as the next President of the United States. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 8:26 pm
United States (1926) with Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 9:30 am
Reagan National Advertising, United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 12:18 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 3:37 pm
She may be referring to United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
This is a Norwich Pharmacal order, named for the case in which it was first granted (see Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); see also The Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd [2013] 1 All ER 928, [2012] 1 WLR 3333, [2012] UKSC 55 (21 November 2012)), and the Supreme Court has affirmed that it forms part of Irish law (see Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497; Ryanair… [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:20 pm
And one month later, a cert petition was filed in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 10:24 am
The immediate conflict in Moyle v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:06 am
United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:42 am
AFSCME and Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 8:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:53 am
United States suffers from shallow reasoning, lack of historical support, and distortion of legal precedent. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 8:03 am
United States for himself. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 8:39 am
The case, Wooden v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm
United States, Sarah Friedman on Hansberry v. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 7:56 am
At Monday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 7:16 am
Supreme Court has agreed to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:36 am
United States, they’ve got some decisions to make. [read post]
3 May 2011, 4:49 pm
FTC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 6:36 am
The conflict around the suitability of Amy Coney Barrett, then, reflects the way law is now understood as the expression of a striving for (eternal?) [read post]