Search for: "COPE v. COPE" Results 401 - 420 of 909
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2010, 1:15 am
and industrial applicability in Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences Inc, noted by the IPKat here, is (according to a normally reliable source whom the Kat thanks) to be heard by the Supreme Court on Thursday 7 October. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
June 20, 2011), and the class action case, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:23 am
In particular they don’t recognise that particular patent strategies need to be adopted based on the scenario they are in, for example early stage v. late stage, academic tech transfer v. secretive long-term development, and collaborative v. independent research. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 6:14 pm
The problem solution approach normally copes admirably under these conditions, but such proceedings too often seem to be deciding the fate of huge amounts of research based on a fortuitous interpretation of a paragraph in the patent specification or in the prior art. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm by NL
This was sufficient in itself to distinguish this case from Hall v Wandsworth LBC, Carter v Wandsworth LBC [2004] EWCA Civ 1740; [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 3:14 pm
 Here are the highlights of these judgements In Guilbault v. [read post]