Search for: "California v. Arizona" Results 401 - 420 of 2,000
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2017, 4:16 am by admin
And in Arizona, provocation happens regardless of the intentions of the plaintiff since provocation depends on whether the action caused the animal to react (rather than on the intent of the actor) Toney v Bouthillier (Ariz App 1981) 631 P2d 557. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 11:41 am by NARF
Cayuga Nation (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act; Fee Lands; Reservation Disestablishment) Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 5:11 pm by Shea Denning
The case is significant for at least two reasons: (1) The Fourth Circuit extended Arizona v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 1:31 pm
  Not to mention the California Court of Appeal opinions, which continue to roll in.Fortunately, my various functions somewhat overlap today. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:31 am by Harold O'Grady
Arizona) was dramatically increased; reading an equal protection clause into the Fifth Amendment (Bolling v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
The Cassinelli Appellate Court then went on to renounce constructive /resulting trust as to other assets held by the (former) service member spouse as available remedies as well, reasoning that would violate federal law and the holding of Mansell v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:44 pm
I argue that the safeguards of Miranda v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:34 am by Lyle Denniston
  In addition, the Court has now scheduled all of the same-sex marriage cases for consideration at its November 20 Conference; that includes eight petitions dealing with the Defense of Marriage Act, one dealing with California’s “Proposition 8″ ban on same-sex marriage, and one dealing with an Arizona law similar to DOMA that restricts marital benefits for state workers to opposite-sex married couples only. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
After all, he wrote an impassioned dissent in the Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:31 pm by Unknown
Klamath Drainage District (Tribal Water and Fishing Rights) California v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 11:09 pm by lawmrh
” The Arizona Court followed the lead of California in Howard v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:54 am
The American Constitution Society's blog reports: The Supreme Court ruled today that Arizona public school officials violated the constitutional rights of a teenage girl when they searched her for prescription-strength ibuprofen. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
S170577: I attended the oral argument today at the California Supreme Court for Sullivan v. [read post]
Last week, the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general in Arizona, California, Georgia, Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, and Texas settled with advertising giants Google and iHeartMedia for deceptive advertising and endorsements under Section 5 of the FTC Act. [read post]