Search for: "Cochran v. Cochran"
Results 401 - 420
of 535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Cochran, No. [read post]
4 May 2022, 12:31 pm
In Cochran v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 12:50 pm
In Cochran v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:50 am
Stephen Lynn Cochran, No. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
[See the Board's February 2008 decision (TTABlogged here), sustaining Nextel's opposition to Motorola's application to register a 911 Hz chirp on the ground that it failed to function as a trademark.]January 14, 2009 - 10 AM: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:34 pm
Ferguson and Brown v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 8:43 pm
The Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Ricky Lee Earp v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
Cochran challenges to the SEC’s administrative law judge system. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 12:20 pm
.'" (Diamond v Diehr (1981). [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 2:22 pm
This issue is presented, but not considered, in Lopez v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
Cochran 2009 WL 3297168(N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:04 pm
Hernan Arquimides Ramos v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809 and R(McLellan) v Bracknell Forest BC [2001] EWCA Civ 1510 stand in the way of the alternative construction argued for the occupiers (ie that they could bring their gateway (b) defence in the county court, rather than by commencing a fresh JR application). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809 and R(McLellan) v Bracknell Forest BC [2001] EWCA Civ 1510 stand in the way of the alternative construction argued for the occupiers (ie that they could bring their gateway (b) defence in the county court, rather than by commencing a fresh JR application). [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 9:13 am
Cochran has appeared on behalf of Freedompoint. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 1:14 pm
App. 2011); see also Napper, 322 S.W.3d at 242 (citing Estrada v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:15 am
[Eagan, Minn.] : West, 2012 v. ; 26 cm. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:06 pm
Her first thought was Johnnie Cochran. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:05 am
Judge Cochran concurred on this very point. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 5:32 am
Cochran, 544 U.S. 734 (2005), the Supreme Court was set to consider the issue, but ended up not deciding it because the plaintiff died while the case was pending. [read post]