Search for: "Company Doe v. Public Citizen" Results 401 - 420 of 1,809
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Indeed, respondents essentially concede that if an entity is a "public body" for purposes of the OML, it is a public "agency" for purposes of FOIL (see generally Perez, 5 NY3d at 528), although the converse is not necessarily true (see Citizens for Alternatives to Animal Labs, Inc. v Board of Trustees of State Univ. of New York, 92 NY2d 357, 362 [1998]). [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 3:05 am by Florence Campbell Jones
The EU notes that whistleblowers are important in uncovering unlawful activities that damage the public interest and the welfare of citizens and society. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:19 am by Edward T. Kang
This is because courts recognize that companies, “regardless of a state’s interest in the transaction of its citizens,” “have an interest in uniformity in dealings with their locations throughout the country,” as in Select Medical v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:48 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Ferrari drove wildly while under the influence.The case is Ferrari v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
When surveyors sued Teranet, one of the company’s defences was that surveyors don’t own the copyrights; the government does. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm by rainey Reitman
U.S. law and the Constitution protect American citizens and legal residents from warrantless surveillance. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:26 pm
" Nevertheless, in a post-Citizens United world, questions of the rights and responsibilities of companies as defined by U.S. courts have become the attention of much public debate and commentary. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Citizens United and McDonald fit that description, as does the attorney’s fees case, Perdue. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 10:04 am by Lyle Denniston
If the Court does reach the core issues in the case of Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]