Search for: "Cox v. Cox"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2020, 9:30 pm
" Jacobson v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Cox v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 5:30 am
The Clash on the Forum Non Conveniens DoctrineIn the case of Cox v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Balderach v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 7:25 am
.'" Cox Communications Inc. et al v. [read post]
28 May 2016, 9:05 am
Contents include:Neville Cox, The Freedom to Publish ‘Irreligious’ Cartoons Amanda Cahill-Ripley, Reclaiming the Peacebuilding Agenda: Economic and Social Rights as a Legal Framework for Building Positive Peace - A Human Security Plus Approach to Peacebuilding Alan Desmond, The Development of a Common EU Migration Policy and the Rights of Irregular Migrants: A Progress Narrative? [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 7:16 am
Hopper v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 2:47 pm
Janine Cox and Nathan Webb won in State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 8:02 am
And the court should provide a necessary check against jury discretion with its power to decide issues as a matter of law and grant new trials.Juries operating outside these parameters might not come to fair results, through no fault of their own, and we think that is what went wrong in Cox v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 12:32 pm
Cox Communications v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:54 am
Cox, Inc. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 7:22 am
Davis v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
We had a post from Oliver Cox on the judgment. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:33 pm
“Judge Cox raised several concerns. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 3:15 pm
Via the ever-vigilant Hugo Cox and the UK's IPO website comes news of an interesting reference to the Court of Justice of the European Communities for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano (Italy) in Case C-168/09 Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa & Famiglia SpA. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 9:00 am
Cox would view your involvement with ‘Loose Change’ much as I do. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 9:38 am
It’s also worth reading this case alongside Cox v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
In Curley v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 7:20 am
Here, the court determined that a background check requirement, distribution of work orders, and customer satisfaction surveys reflected no more than a legitimate contractor relationship between the cable company and the contractor it hired to provide installation and maintenance services (Crosby v. [read post]
