Search for: "Deal v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 25,951
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2016, 1:55 pm
The case of Bernardoni v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 7:50 am
In Arista v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:31 pm
Supreme Court handed down its third major decision this term dealing with ineffective assistance of counsel, Martinez v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:49 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 7:13 am
United States, No. 14-6166, deals with one of the broadest laws for extending federal criminal jurisdiction to seemingly local cases, the Hobbs Act. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 12:06 pm
In State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 12:27 pm
In Lacey v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
In that same vein, following is a discussion of a (less recent) decision from the United States Supreme Court, Elgin v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:39 pm
CAAF has released its fourth opinion of the term: United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:32 am
In AJ v JJ & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 1448 the court was required to deal with the situation where the children wished to have their views heard in an abduction case.Lord Justice ThorpeThe Facts: As Lord Justice Thorpe said giving the leading judgment, on the face of it this was a paradigm case for a return order. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 3:13 pm
However, in plea bargaining the criminal defense lawyer and the state ADA (Assistant District Attorney) or federal AUSA (Assistant United States Attorney) work together to find a mutually acceptable plea deal regarding conviction and sentencing. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 4:40 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 1:00 pm
Hill v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
Becton, Dickinson was the "big deal" case on inequitable conduct. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:22 pm
Anucinski v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:43 am
On 25 February 2021, the UK Supreme Court heard the appeal in Anwar v The Advocate General (Representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy). [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:33 am
Regina (McGetrick) v Parole Board and another [2012] EWHC 882 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 114 “When considering and making its substantive recommendation on the question of the early release or recall of prisoners on licence following a reference to it by the Secretary of State for Justice, the Parole Board was ‘dealing with the case’ within the meaning of section 239(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and was therefore required to consider all the documents… [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:59 am
As the 8th District’s decision a couple weeks ago in State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2006, 7:59 am
R (Boughton and Ors) v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
In Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
