Search for: "Dodd v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,057
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2012, 6:10 am
Dealers Assoc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:45 am
Circuit’s recent opinion in Canning v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
With Dodd-Frank giving the SEC extraordinarily broad authority in this area, the Agency has room to take corrective actions should state courts effectively limit the use of access. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 11:46 am
The outcome of a case called PHH v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am
In Collins v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 9:17 am
Cohen v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:34 am
In this case, the Senate report accompanying Dodd-Frank Section 929A stated that the intent of the amendment was to clarify Section 806. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:51 pm
However, per Wayne State University Law School Peter Henning, in BNA Securities Daily, Dodd-Frank’s provision may not carry much weight if a ratings agency’s First Amendment rights are widely interpreted. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
See, Scott James Preston, Whistleblowing in Intercollegate Athletics, University Business, March 28, 2012, (discussing Glenn Hedden v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” The OCC further notes in the letter that it is “committed to preserving the legal framework for preemption established by Congress, including in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 7:33 am
The SEC has proposed new regulations to implement the “bad boy” provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
” But the whistleblower’s cert petition argues that Sarbanes-Oxley shifts the burden to the employer to prove a lack of retaliatory intent as an affirmative defense (Murray v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:38 am
As discussed in this earlier post, the Commissioner has also proposed amendments to Rule 260.204.9 that would implement a longer lasting response to the realignment of state and federal authority over investment advisers as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
The statute also stated that the employer was not liable if the employee had a preexisting injury. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:14 am
Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:23 am
Supreme Court issued its decision in Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 9:30 pm
Michael McConnell discusses Trump v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm
Corner Post v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 11:45 am
Circuit’s decision in PHH v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 6:20 am
The Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
