Search for: "Gallagher v State" Results 401 - 420 of 542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:24 am
East Donegal Co-Operative v AG provides the classic statement. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:12 am by Mandelman
 If I wanted to use the corporation, I suppose I would simply contact the state and pay the current fees and bring it back to life. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
   We explained in Red Families v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:20 pm by Mandelman
 If I wanted to use the corporation, I suppose I would simply contact the state and pay the current fees and bring it back to life. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 6:14 am by John Culhane
Their factual case was based, at bottom, on the conjecture of David Blankenhorn, who acknowledged that marriage would be good for same-sex families – compare Maggie Gallagher, who won’t even concede this much – but then stated that it wasn’t worth the cost to traditional marriage, which would (somehow, likely, maybe) thereby be weakened. [read post]