Search for: "Howard v. State of California" Results 401 - 420 of 581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:25 am by David Kopel
Plenty of immigrants had experience with the California gold rush in the previous decade, and they aimed to avoid the anarchic conditions of the early California gold rush. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am by Eugene Volokh
In several major cities and counties, in some territories, perhaps in the whole state of California, and to a small extent in Minnesota, private businesses may not discriminate against patrons based on certain of their political activities. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 2:31 am by SHG
Howard Matz of the Central District of California tosses FCPA convictions for misconduct. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
Christopher Meyer looks at the impact of last Term’s decision in Baker Botts v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:33 pm by GSU Law Student
In 1948, Murray published their first book, States’ Laws on Race and Color, a 700-hundred-page analysis and critique of segregation in the United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
It undergirded the English Civil War and the American Revolution; it helped shape the French Revolution; it got Karl Marx arrested; and in 1970s California it fired up an activist named Howard Jarvis, who shocked the political establishment with the success of Proposition 13, generally regarded as the first battleground of the modern property tax revolt.[1] With the benefit of hindsight, Proposition 13’s success appears obvious. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
In exotic places such as California people regularly sit in saunas and hot tubs with unclothed strangers. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:06 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Second, California’s and Utah’s interpretation of comment k is wrong and is not sound policy. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:04 am by Mandelman
  I understand how it happened, however, as it’s an easy mistake to make, thanks to the California State Bar’s ongoing refusal to make clear what California’s “new” law prohibits and what it allows. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:17 am by Adam Chandler
The second O’Connor story comes from the state of Nevada, where voters are considering a ballot initiative that would change the way the state judges are selected. [read post]