Search for: "LIMB v. LIMB"
Results 401 - 420
of 859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
Second, there is the relationship between the “conventional” and “reportage” limbs of Reynolds. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:28 am
One such reported case is that of Kevin Smith v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 1:59 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today (Wormell v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:56 am
In Rosetta Stone Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:04 am
In Ţîmpău v Romania [2023] ECHR 982, the applicant, Doina Ţîmpău, challenged her dismissal as a lay teacher of Orthodox religion in a public school. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:16 am
The Commercial Court upheld all limbs of Sino’s claim, holding that BX did not have authority to receive the notice on Sino’s behalf. [read post]
5 Nov 2022, 11:00 am
Lo and behold, a recent opinion out of the Middle District of Florida, Dero Roofing, LLC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:13 am
This can be traced back to the outcome of Pliva, Inc. v Mensing in 2011. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 6:32 am
Look Cycle International v. [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 12:18 am
A recent interesting instance can be found in the decision delivered by Justice Bakhru of the Delhi High Court in the case of Monsanto v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 4:19 am
Laverne John Andrusiek v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 6:52 am
Whether a mark is registered in colour or in black is not regarded as a wholly negligible element in the eyes of consumers (Pico Food v OHIM, T‑623/11).There are also differences between the dominant elements of the marks at issue: the human figure in the earlier mark represents a man standing on one foot, whereas the lower limbs of the human figure in the mark applied for are not depicted. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
In R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal; R (MR Pakistan) (FC) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) the Supreme Court determined an important question of principle regarding the nature of the relationship between the Upper Tribunal and the High Court, namely the circumstances in which decisions of the Upper Tribunal are open to challenge in judicial review proceedings. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 10:34 am
In James Rose and Robert Underwood v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:00 pm
Many other individuals must have their limbs amputated to survive. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 5:59 am
He was unable to move his limbs or sit up on his own. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:06 am
He cited to the CCA opinion in Gengnagel v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:12 pm
So I was very interested to see the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's ruling in Toney v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 3:00 am
In Askin v. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 11:12 pm
The operation of this provision was demonstrated in Zeran v America Online Inc, 129 F3d 327 (4th Cir., 1997). [read post]
