Search for: "Law v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 155,742
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2025, 10:03 am
City of New York v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 9:09 am
On Feb. 10, three faith-based refugee assistance agencies and nine individual plaintiffs sued the administration, arguing the suspension violates Congress’ authority to make immigration laws. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 8:53 am
Soc. of Divine Word v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 8:40 am
Appellants, a Diocese, alleged that the City of Pittsburg and a Board member violated local, state, and federal laws, as well as constitutional violations. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 8:34 am
In the wake of the Supreme Court's reversal of Roe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 8:33 am
自由西藏 [1] “Hallucinations in Law and in Government,” Tortini (Feb. 19, 2025). [2] Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH & West Publishing Corp. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 8:26 am
The February 2025 Justice Department letter to the Senate cited a more recent Supreme Court decision, Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 8:12 am
Under the Supreme Court’s 1959 ruling in Napue v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 7:46 am
United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935) [2]Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 7:30 am
A decade ago as reported here, in a 5-4 ruling in favor of the state in Glossip v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 7:00 am
State Abortion Laws Tracker After Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 6:36 am
In Mahmoud v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
She was denied again on appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States in Bradwell v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 6:07 am
However, the current state of AI has its shortcomings. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 5:01 am
This meant calling openly for the overruling of Roe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 5:00 am
Four years ago, in Germany v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 4:00 am
I'll address three aspects of the Valentine's Day Dear Colleague letter.First, the Dear Colleague letter states that under the 2023 SCOTUS decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 2:30 am
That states a lawyer’s signature on a court-filed document certifies that “the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law or establishing new law. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 2:28 am
Summary judgment test The judge started out by repeating the explanation of the summary judgment test/principles set out in Easyair Ltd v Opal [2009] EWHC 339 (Ch), which states that: each claim must have a realistic rather than a fanciful prospect of success; a realistic claim is one that is “more than merely arguable”; and that in reaching its findings, the court must not conduct a “mini-trial”. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 12:16 am
Clergy Discipline Measure 2003: Ecclesiastical Law Society working party interim report The Ecclesiastical Law Society has published the interim report of its working party reviewing the Clergy Discipline Measure 2003. [read post]
