Search for: "Mills v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 920
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2008, 9:17 am
Cir. 2005) (holding that users of accused system could not infringe method claims in the United States because one step of the method was performed in Canada). [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 3:35 pm by Mark Litwak
Mills, chief judge of the United States District Court Northern District of Mississippi, found in favor of Sony and dismissed the complaint. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  We’ve touched on these issues back in 2011, when we blogged about Mills v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:32 am by Beth Graham
Breyer is probably the only avowed true purposivist on the United States Supreme Court, although certain other members of the Court may be influenced by purposivism to at least some degree. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive Guide for cerebral palsy. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:17 am by Bexis
§ 337(a) "makes clear that the United States is the only party that has standing to bring such a claim. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:21 am by Liisa Speaker
In November 2012, Flint voters passed a five-year, six-mill millage to collect funds for public safety. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:03 am by Steve Hall
Spisak's case hinged on how the courts should apply Mills v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 5:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It thus became the third federal appeals court to reach that result; so far, no federal court at that level has upheld a ban in the wake of last year’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]