Search for: "PARKER v. UNITED STATES"
Results 401 - 420
of 827
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2017, 12:47 pm
Parker, assistant to the U.S. solicitor general Parker seemed to agree, but added that there was more to consider here: The house was in a state of “disarray. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:45 am
United States, 19 F.2d 739 (U.S. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 am
States also have the administrative authority to bar providers from participating in their State Medical Assistance Programs (primarily Medicaid and CHIP).[5] Medicaid exclusion actions[6] are similar to OIG exclusions in many respects, but there are also important differences. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Patent No. 5,643,446 entitled FUEL FILTER AND PRIMING PUMP and owned by Parker-Hannifan. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Patent No. 5,643,446 entitled FUEL FILTER AND PRIMING PUMP and owned by Parker-Hannifan. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:26 am
Since the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government could no longer refuse to recognize marriages of same-sex couples in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:29 pm
He thus notes that this incident occurred in 2012, before same-sex marriage was legal in Colorado or protected under the equal protection clause to the United States Constitution. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 9:00 am
The UPICs Perform numerous functions to detect, prevent, and deter specific risks and broader vulnerabilities to the integrity of the Medicare and Medicaid programs including, but not limited to:Proactively identify incidents of potential fraud, waste, and abuse that exist within its service area and take appropriate action on each case;Investigate allegations of fraud made by beneficiaries, providers/suppliers, CMS, Health & Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG), and other… [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 12:36 am
United States Department of Defense U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:43 am
On June 11, 2018, the United States Supreme Court ruled that American Pipe tolling does not extend to follow-on class actions brought after the statute of limitations period has run. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm
And while such bodies may benefit from the immunity recognized in Parker v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 9:17 am
V. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
In short, the court concluded in LePage v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:12 am
United States, 283 F.2d 430 (9th Cir.1960) (threat of damage to property was made merely by mentioning troubles that other contractors had had); People v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:11 am
NYCLU gets the reports.The case is United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 7:03 am
The test simply goes too far.The case is United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:24 pm
Tex. 1969); United States v. [read post]
