Search for: "Parcell v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,744
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
When Is an Interest in a California Real Estate Syndicate a “Security” Under State and Federal Laws?
5 Jun 2017, 4:58 pm
Supreme Court decided Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:57 pm
Today, the Texas Supreme Court issued opinions in Severance v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 10:30 am
” Berkeley Hills Watershed Coalition v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:25 am
If just one of these elements is missing, the claim will fail.In Comrie, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 10:55 am
At yesterday’s oral argument in Murr v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 8:22 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 12:39 pm
[v] Iowa R. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:44 am
In United States v. 4.85 Acres of Land, No. 07-35310 (Sep. 29, 2008), the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the trial court should not have refused to admit evidence of sales at properties nearby the property taken, even though the sales occurred after the taking. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:16 pm
The court stated that since the mortgage covered the entire parcel, improvement to any portion of the parcel would be sufficient as to all lots contained within it. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 5:46 am
State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Hansen Knick v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 10:09 am
Rominger v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:01 am
In Lichoulas v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 8:29 pm
Abbott & Kristen Kortick South of Market Community Action Network v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:04 am
United Parcel Service General Services Co. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 11:57 am
State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 6:48 am
State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Since the ruling in Young v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 8:08 am
California's Fifth Appellate District held recently in King v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 9:02 pm
Accordingly, the court reversed the trial court’s order, and the ZBA’s decision was reinstated. 5542 Penn LP v. [read post]