Search for: "People v. Ross" Results 401 - 420 of 590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
 Paranova Danmark A/S, Paranova Pack A/S v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
 Paranova Danmark A/S, Paranova Pack A/S v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 10:37 am by Alysha Stein-Manes
While the status of an employer’s obligation to accommodate marijuana usage for medical reasons under state law also appears to remain unchanged following Prop 64’s passage, the controlling California case on this issue, Ross v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 6:58 am by Ben
Edinburgh's Court of Session found that the screening of a match between Celtic and Ross County was infringing and the Bar owners were also in contempt of court after breaching an interim interdict order against screening Sky's programmes (here a Scotland v Belgium international football match just hours after after the order was made) without a commercial agreement in place. [read post]
18 Feb 2017, 9:37 am by Stephen Griffin
  People begin to feel nervous about what should be standard government operations. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:44 am by Ben
Edinburgh's Court of Session found that the screening of a match between Celtic and Ross County was infringing and the Bar owners were also in contempt of court after breaching an interim interdict order against screening Sky's programmes (here a Scotland v Belgium international football match just hours after after the order was made) without a commercial agreement in place. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
The RCMP and other police services made it clear that LGBTQ2+ people were not welcome to serve as police officers. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Ross v Oxford Academy & CSD, 187 AD2d 898, leave to appeal denied, 81 NY2d 705]Suspending an employee for 30 days without pay for engaging in conduct that may result in a safety hazard. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Ross v Oxford Academy & CSD, 187 AD2d 898, leave to appeal denied, 81 NY2d 705]Suspending an employee for 30 days without pay for engaging in conduct that may result in a safety hazard. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm by Kenneth Vercammen
 at 536.]Apropos here, "[c]ross motions for summary judgment do not preclude the existence of issues of fact." [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
IPSO 12126-22 Nash, Waugh and The Lighthouse Group v The Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2023), 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation 09772-23 Peet v Sunday People, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 14431-23 Resolution Statement Booley v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 16942-23 Hood v dailyrecord.co.uk, 1… [read post]