Search for: "People v. Reynolds"
Results 401 - 420
of 464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
Though the plan created districts roughly equal in total population, the appellants contend that it nevertheless contains “gross disparities in voters or potential voters,” and thereby runs afoul of the Fourteenth Amendment’s “one person, one vote” principle under Reynolds v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Consider the Court’s 1978 decision in Bakke (Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
For example, my amicus brief in Espinoza v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:04 pm
§ 3582(c)), and even though the right to counsel applies to post-sentencing actions that affect time in custody (Mempa v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 6:06 am
Eisenhower's nefarious plan to enforce Brown v. [read post]
The Implications of An ICJ Finding that Israel is Committing the Crime Against Humanity of Apartheid
20 Mar 2024, 5:55 am
As law professor John Reynolds explains, “With the dismantling of apartheid in South Africa the special committee was dissolved by the UN. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 12:23 pm
Read his amicus brief in Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
The headline in The Economist reads: “A new Supreme Court case may dampen protections for LGBT people. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
(Although as a general matter, voting within state and local government must follow the one-person, one-vote rule of Reynolds v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:51 pm
The Consultation Paper explains that this is intended to ensure that the provision catches publications to a limited number of people (e.g. a blog with a small number of subscribers). [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 7:58 am
How not to do a TV interview Zac v Snow The silly season starts soon. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:02 pm
The Ninth Circuit, in Fordyce v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Bigamy was for a long time a state crime; and it was declared a federal crime in 1862 by the Morrill Act, a law aimed specifically at the Mormons that was upheld by the Supreme Court in 1878 in Reynolds v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 12:31 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
Reynolds, 369 F.3d 1270, 1276-77 (11th Cir. 2004)(same); Buckley v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
In McNally v. [read post]
