Search for: "People v. Score" Results 401 - 420 of 1,631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm by NL
Mr H refused the fourth property because PH refused a to pay a moving allowance, payable to people downsizing from a larger property, although it waived rent arrears. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm by NL
Mr H refused the fourth property because PH refused a to pay a moving allowance, payable to people downsizing from a larger property, although it waived rent arrears. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:52 pm by Andrew Dat
  The case which tells us how to do this is Katz v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:05 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Maryland, to argue that people have no reasonable expectation of privacy in their phone records under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:51 am
The Episcopal Church, et al.; and No. 11-0332, Masterson v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:14 am
Via Berman, the 2d Circuit has affirmed Judge Lewis Kaplan's dismissal in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 10:32 am by Rosa Schechter
  Lots of people are still combing through all the things that the Florida Legislature undertook in 2012; here are two new laws that are of interest to Florida real estate developers and investors. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:37 am by SHG
She was not in the Trump cabinet, for those keeping score. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:55 am by Ron Coleman
Neither one cared, just as the Third Circuit didn’t (no real reason they should have on that score) and the Electronic Freedom Foundation didn’t (for that I have not forgiven them) and I moved on. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 9:59 am
    So, the score is: the French 2, the Firemen 1. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 12:54 pm
That is what happened in both People v Bunnell (2009 NY Slip Op 00752 [4th Dept 2/6/09]) and People v Erb (2009 NY Slip Op 00881 [4th Dept 2/6/09])In Bunnell the Court vacated the restitution order, on the basis of an error neither objected to at the trial court, nor raised on appeal. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm by Marty Lederman
The constitutional analysis in the Supreme Court's decision yesterday in Matal v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:43 am by Joe Mullin
“The People” as Author The Supreme Court first addressed the issue of whether government rules can be copyrighted in the 1834 case of Wheaton v. [read post]