Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
They stem from the long-established principle of United Kingdom public law that statutory powers must be used for the purpose for which they were conferred and not for some other purpose: Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:14 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:46 pm
The CAFC noted: The assignments, how- ever, make the relevant comparison between the claims of the ’516 patent, which define the inventions claimed therein, Phillips v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 9:25 am
Phillips v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
In commentary at CNN International, Aaron Carroll weighs in, describing this Term as “a pivotal moment for the Supreme Court, for politics, and for the future of health care reform in the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:41 pm
The biggest problem with Alice’s case (presented by Carter Phillips) is its similarity to Bilski v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Bloomsbury International Ltd v Sea Fish Industry Authority and DEFRA [2011] UKSC 25 has its origins in a claim brought by importers unhappy with the imposition of a levy. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
Furthermore, with respect to the Emerson defendants, it is undisputed that they were not present when the allegedly defamatory statement was made and, significantly, the complaint is bereft of any allegations setting forth a basis to hold them liable for Burrows’s statement (see Bostich v United States Trust Corp., 233 AD2d 193, 194). [read post]
5 May 2016, 9:18 am
On April 1, 2016, the United States Patent and Trademark Office published final rules in the Federal Register that relate to post grant proceedings. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:14 pm
He submitted that current interpretation of fair use, eg Cariou v Prince, is different from what fair use used to be, say, 20 years ago] should be imported into these laws - as well as different approaches that have arisen in the course of these processes. [read post]
13 May 2016, 1:56 pm
In United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:29 pm
Essentially, Carnwath LJ endorsed the application of the test set by the European Court in A v United Kingdom and elucidated in AF (No. 3). [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 7:25 am
Additionally, in Phillip v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 10:30 am
Sexual harassment is recognized as a form of unlawful sexual harassment throughout the United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am
Why do Lee and Phillips misrepresent the intentionalist position? [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am
Why do Lee and Phillips misrepresent the intentionalist position? [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Bazarsky, The Future of PennsylvaniaProducts Liability as Applied by Federal and State Courts: Covell v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
" But even if they were compelled, he adequately waived his Garrityprotections, United States v. [read post]
