Search for: "Plante v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 4,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2014, 11:06 am
A recent decision by a federal court in the Southern District of New York, HLP Properties, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Nevertheless, the OD dealt with the objection in substance […] by stating that claims 1 and 2 of auxiliary request II were not limited to a single plant variety and were therefore allowable under A 53(b) and R 23b(4) EPC 1973. [23] Under these circumstances the objection under A 100(a) in conjunction with A 53(b) against product claims relating to tomato fruits cannot be regarded as a fresh ground of opposition which may be introduced in the appeal proceedings only with the… [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:50 am
El Paso Marketing, LP v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 4:24 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
Supreme Court reversed the precedent-setting decision in Connecticut v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 5:28 am
The Florida Supreme Court upheld Florida v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:24 am
The Supreme Court held in 1983 that the Atomic Energy Act preempted safety regulation of nuclear power by States, leaving only economic regulation permissible to the states. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
Hans v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:47 pm
According to Alaska State Troopers, Rick Ross, 57, Sam Pavala, 49 and Angela Chingliak were returning to Goodnews from the Coastal Villages Seafood plant in Platinum with donated food when tragedy struck. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 9:56 pm
Bowman v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:31 am
That happened in Cornwell v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 4:50 am
State, 856 So. 2d 1133, 1138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (citing Benefield v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 7:27 am
The appellant argued that the VAT was a mandatory inclusion in his price which was state imposed and therefore he was collecting on behalf of the state. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 10:21 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 10:39 am
Circuit Court, leading twenty-one states, the trade group for the power plants, and the trade group for the suppliers of coal to those plants to take the case on to the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:23 am
In essence, Murray is claiming that EPA and the states cannot double regulate power plants. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:23 am
In essence, Murray is claiming that EPA and the states cannot double regulate power plants. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:28 am
The United States, on behalf of U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 2:08 pm
Ireland ECR [2006] I-4635 (the famous "MOX Plant" case, see our post here) but that case concerned disputes between member States and the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Justice laid down in what is now Article 258 TFEU (ex Article 226 EC) not between investors and States. [read post]
