Search for: "SEC v. National Securities, Inc."
Results 401 - 420
of 491
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2011, 4:30 am
July 22, 2011) the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) brought suit against the investment company Standford Group Company (“SGC”) and related entities for allegedly perpetrating a massive Ponzi scheme. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:39 pm
The Justice Department has been investigating Bridgestone’s involvement in international cartel activities relating to the sale of marine hose since May 2007, according to the statement.The case is U.S. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 7:02 am
” Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
Mar. 26, 2024); Black Economic Council of Massachusetts, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 12:53 pm
I, Sec. 8, cl. 8. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 9:10 pm
Disney had to report its payment to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), so we know that much. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:00 am
While there, she prosecuted many notable FCA cases including several qui tam cases against National Medicare Care, Inc. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
If they never made any payments on their respective loans, Foster and Mock were in effect net beneficiaries of the predatory loans (at least as long as the Trusts do not garnish their bank accounts, if any, judgments secured). [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
Roman v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
In the SEC’s Examination Priorities, published on January 12, 2017, the SEC warned publicly traded companies that it will be investigating cybersecurity practices with higher scrutiny.[18] Specifically, the SEC states that “[i]n 2017, we will continue our initiative to examine for cybersecurity compliance procedures and controls, including testing and implementation of those procedures and controls. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
In the SEC’s Examination Priorities, published on January 12, 2017, the SEC warned publicly traded companies that it will be investigating cybersecurity practices with higher scrutiny.[18] Specifically, the SEC states that “[i]n 2017, we will continue our initiative to examine for cybersecurity compliance procedures and controls, including testing and implementation of those procedures and controls. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 3:10 pm
American Furukawa, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2009, 5:53 pm
Penguin Group (USA) Inc., et al. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:06 am
3M Company v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 12:36 am
Supreme Court decision, Atherton v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve and Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 1:15 am
In Axcan Scandipharm v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:49 pm
It's been a while since I taught Securities Regulation, but my recollection is that the SEC takes the position that shareholder rights under the securities laws cannot be subject to mandatory arbitration. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:14 am
” At Arbitration Nation, Liz Kramer observes that when the court rules in the third new case, Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:57 am
SEC, 585 U.S. 237 (2018); (2) Stern v. [read post]
