Search for: "Sellers v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 1,420
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2012, 4:48 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
 the property of Cambodia in exactly the same way that the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse is the property of the United States." [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:01 am by Dennis Crouch
Thriving Resale Market: EBay argues that the Omega ruling "could have a detrimental effect on the ability of buyers and sellers of secondary-market goods to engage in commerce in the United States. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 1:20 pm
As the Seventh Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
Marketplace facilitators are required to register and collect and remit state and local sales and use tax on all taxable remote sales for delivery into Louisiana that the marketplace facilitator transacts on its own behalf or facilitates on behalf of a marketplace seller. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 11:10 am by Lincoln W. Hobbs, Esq., CCAL
If the Developer of a condominium project was also the contractor-seller, that developer/contractor-seller would owe each unit owner a duty to disclose known defects in the units and the common areas, an interest in which was also being sold.Next, the Court held, to a limited degree, that the developer’s limited fiduciary duty to the Association does fall outside of the doctrine. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:09 am by Broc Romanek
Seller's Key Issues in 2010: Still a Tough Seller's Market Tune in tomorrow for the DealLawyers.com webcast - "Seller's Key Issues in 2010: Still a Tough Seller's Market" - to hear Wilson Chu of K&L Gates, Mary Korby of Weil Gotshal and Carl Sanchez of Paul Hastings discuss the latest issues for sellers doing deals. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 11:27 am
Burnette filed an antitrust class action complaint against numerous real estate brokerages in the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am by Guest Blogger
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]