Search for: "Seven Cases v. United States"
Results 401 - 420
of 4,337
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2023, 5:37 am
The United States Supreme Court in Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am
Hawaii, which upheld Donald Trump's anti-Muslim travel ban, and Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
If enacted, the Act would be the first comprehensive consumer health information privacy law in the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
As of April 3, seven of the bills had been enacted into law, 20 were effectively dead, and 72 were still pending. . . [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 5:08 am
The FDA did not appeal that appealable order, and when seven States that might take such an appeal asked to intervene, the FDA opposed their request. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:12 pm
S. ____ (2023) 1 ALITO, J., dissenting SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 22A901 _________________ DANCO LABORATORIES, LLC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
United States that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) does not apply to criminal prosecutions. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:57 am
On Mar. 30, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued its judgment on the merits in Certain Iranian Assets, nearly seven years after the case between Iran and the United States was first filed. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 8:53 pm
Even making the demonstrably false assumption that all of these cases require a visit to one of the thousands of emergency rooms in the United States, it is far from a "statistical certainty" that one of the plaintiff doctors will handle one of these cases, as these cases represent a tiny fraction of the over 130 million emergency department visits each year. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 6:33 am
See, United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:55 am
Because appointing a justice generally requires a seven-member majority, the incumbent justices could block the appointment of a new member. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
If that were the case, no drug on the U.S. market would meet Judge Kacsmaryk’s standards. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 5:13 am
Rashmi Srivastava v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:12 am
Cal.Implications for sanctions motion in United States et al. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
Because the district court found that the conduct relevant to PLCAA’s focus occurred in the United States, it decided to apply that statute to the case, even though other relevant facts occurred abroad. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
There was also a hearing in the case of LCG and others v OVD and others. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
At summer’s end last year, the International Law Commission (ILC) concluded the work of its 73rd session and issued its annual report to the United Nations (U.N.) [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 6:33 pm
People v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]
