Search for: "State v. Poland" Results 401 - 420 of 707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2018, 12:00 pm by FM Librarian
Regimes of Justification in and around R v Appulonappa," Canadian Journal of Law and Society = Revue Canadienne Droit et Société, vol. 33, no. 1 (April 2018)"'In the Sport I Am Here': Therapeutic Processes and Health Effects of Sport and Exercise on PTSD," Qualitative Health Research, vol. 28, no. 3 (2018)"Infectious Disease Profiles of Syrian and Eritrean Migrants Presenting in Europe: A Systematic Review," Travel Medicine and… [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 8:53 am by JURIST Staff
As a brief overview, in the United States, the number of discriminatory bills targeting LGBTQ+ folks proposed by state lawmakers reached an all-time high in 2022. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 4:49 am by Emma Snell
The ruling is the latest significant decision dismantling a gun restriction in the wake of the Supreme Court’s expansion of Second Amendment rights last year in the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 8:28 am by Ben
Circuit Has recently faced in the dispute between Spanski Enterprises v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:27 am by Liam Thornton
AG Trstenjak stated that the UK (and Poland) have obligations under the EUCFR. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
  He is unpersuaded that the post-Shevill case law should be reversed but suggests that, in addition, a “focalisation” principle should apply, using the context of the statement in question to determine which Member State’s jurisdiction is the most appropriate. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(IP:JUR) A single EU patent looks dead in the water as member states seek alternatives (IAM) Neither democracy nor constitution: is it time to reign in EPO rule-making? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
(IP:JUR) A single EU patent looks dead in the water as member states seek alternatives (IAM) Neither democracy nor constitution: is it time to reign in EPO rule-making? [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am by Marie Louise
Becton, Dickinson and Company (Patently-O) Patent malpractice litigation: State versus federal jurisdiction: Magnetek, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 1:39 pm by Olivier Moréteau
, Olivier Moréteau, Louisiana State University (United States)V.B         Diverse in Unity? [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am by Melina Padron
W -v- M and S and A NHS Primary Care Trust [COP 1182483] Court of protection: Not in woman in vegetative state’s best interests to remove artificial nutrition and hydration. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am by Marie Louise
Murray (IP finance) United States US Patent Reform America Invents Act: First to Invent v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:50 am by Jan von Hein
Other circumstances were expressly deemed to be “not decisive”, especially the stays of mother and child in Poland in the context of leave periods or holidays, the mother’s cultural ties to Poland and her intention of settling in Poland in the future. [read post]