Search for: "State v. Borough" Results 401 - 420 of 1,315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2011, 2:14 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MD (Gambia), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 121 (17 February 2011) Test Claimants In the Thin Cap Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs [2011] EWCA Civ 127 (18 February 2011) Axa Sun Life Services Plc v Campbell Martin Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 133 (18 February 2011) Welford v Transport for London [2011] EWCA Civ 129 (18 February 2011) Bayat Telephone… [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm by Giles Peaker
(G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2004] 2 AC 208 (HL(E))  establishes that it is not possible to carve out a section 17 duty to house families where children are already accommodated. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm by Giles Peaker
(G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2004] 2 AC 208 (HL(E))  establishes that it is not possible to carve out a section 17 duty to house families where children are already accommodated. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:13 pm by Giles Peaker
The court was persuaded In Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No. 2) [2004] 1 AC 816, Lord Hope stated at paragraph 106:- “… Article I of the First Protocol has a similar character [to Article 6(1)]. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 9:01 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Zafar & Ors v R [2008] EWCA Crim 184 (13 February 2008) K v R [2008] EWCA Crim 185 (13 February 2008) JT v R. [2008] EWCA Crim 183 (12 February 2008) Kelly, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 137 (08 February 2008) AS, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 138 (08 February 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Hansford v Southampton Magistrates’ Court [2008] EWHC 67 (Admin) (19 February 2008) Rashid, R (on the… [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:17 pm by NL
Nzamy v Brent London Borough Council Court of Appeal, January 26, 2011 [Arden eflash 420. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 1:27 pm by Giles Peaker
Croydon London Borough Council v Kalonga (2021) EWCA Civ 77 This is the Court of Appeal judgment of Croydon’s appeal from the High Court decision that we noted here. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:52 am by Giles Peaker
Croydon London Borough Council v Kalonga (2022) UKSC 7 In which the Supreme Court considered the position on termination of ‘flexible tenancies’ – fixed term secure tenancies – during the fixed term. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:25 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) L’Oreal SA & Ors v Bellure NV & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 535 (21 May 2010) Re W (Children) [2010] EWCA Civ 537 (20 May 2010) Groveholt Ltd v Hughes & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 538 (20 May 2010) MJ (Angola) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 557 (20 May 2010) Condron, R (on the application of) v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 534 (20 May 2010) Nessa… [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 11:50 am by Giles Peaker
This would be ‘manifestly without reasonable foundation’, following R (Turley) v Wandsworth LBC (2017) EWCA Civ 189, (2017) HLR 21 and R (DA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2019) UKSC 21. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am by Giles Peaker
London Borough of Wandsworth v NJ [2013] EWCA Civ 1373NJ applied as homeless to Wandsworth. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am by Giles Peaker
London Borough of Wandsworth v NJ [2013] EWCA Civ 1373NJ applied as homeless to Wandsworth. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The public authority ought to recognise that there had been a promise or representation and, where it is considering reneging on such a promise, this ought to be taken into account in the decision making process (R (Bibi) v Newham London Borough Council [2002] 1 WLR 237). [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 4:55 am
& Ors v R. [2007] EWCA Crim 1925 (30 July 2007) Saleem, R. v [2007] EWCA Crim 1923 (27 July 2007) Rafferty v R [2007] EWCA Crim 1898 (26 July 2007) El-Kurd & Ors, R v [2007] EWCA Crim 1888 (26 July 2007) High Court (Administrative Court) Kelly, R (on the application of) v Warley Magistrates Court & Anor [2007] EWHC 1836 (Admin) (31 July 2007) Corby Borough Council, R (on the application of) v Secretary of… [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:56 am by sally
Supreme Court Gisda Cyf v Barratt [2010] UKSC 41 (13 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Shah v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2326 (13 October 2010) Dorset County Council v House (Rev 1) [2010] EWCA Crim 2270 (13 October 2010) O & H, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2233 (13 October 2010) King v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWCA Crim 2522 (13 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Broomleigh Housing Association Ltd v… [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 9:35 am by Giles Peaker
Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd v TM (2021) EWCA Civ 1890 We saw in Taylor v Slough Borough Council (2020) EWHC 3520 (Ch) (our note) that in possession claims where a defence of breach of public sector equality duty was raised, the courts would be prepared to accept subsequent compliance (even after the issue of proceedings) as ‘remedying’ the breach. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 9:24 am
Borough of Paulsboro, 191 N.J. 344 (2007) case and the ERETC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm by Matthew David Brozik
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course, STARBUCKS. [read post]