Search for: "State v. Hobbs" Results 401 - 420 of 755
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
  Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court held that “‘a robber who affects or attempts to affect even the intrastate sale of marijuana grown within the state’ necessarily satisfies the ‘affects commerce’ element of the federal Hobbs Act criminal statute. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 1:51 am
COURT OF APPEALS,M SECOND CIRCUIT Criminal Practice Hobbs Act Requires Jury to Find Robbery of Drugs, Drug Proceeds, Affects Interstate Commerce United States, appellee v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:45 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEvidence Union Officer's Prior Bad Acts Admissible to Show Intent in Trial for Hobbs Act Extortion, Embezzlement United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 1:31 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEvidence Union Officer's Prior Bad Acts Admissible to Show Intent in Trial for Hobbs Act Extortion, Embezzlement United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm by Anna Salvatore
Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs said last month that her family had received “utterly abhorrent” death threats after President Trump lost her state. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 11:52 am
In other words, the employee does not have the right to designate his or her own attorney in such situations.* The Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 11:50 am by Lyle Denniston
  The issue is whether such a recommendation qualifies as “property” under the Hobbs Act, which makes it a crime to obtain property by threats. ** United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
Hobbs, a challenge to a state law that changes signature requirements for candidates. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:52 am by Ted Frank
As some states have moved against the death penalty, the anti-punishment wing of the bar has now opened a second front against life sentences, already with some success in Graham v. [read post]