Search for: "State v. Sanders" Results 401 - 420 of 936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2022, 5:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “The complaint, as augmented by the affidavit of Singh submitted in opposition to the defendants’ motion to dismiss, sufficiently stated a cause of action for legal malpractice (see CPLR 3211[a][7]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88; Doe v Ascend Charter Schs., 181 AD3d 648, 649-650). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:09 am by David Ettinger
The court on October 2 will hear the following cases (with the issues presented as stated on the court’s website): DiCampli-Mintz v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 3:45 am
Tuesday's first argument will be in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 3:00 pm
State (Judge Najam writing) and Sanders v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:05 am by David Markus
Archer, 531 F.3d 1347, 1352 (11th Cir. 2008), and United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm by Neil Siegel
Sanders, the Court turned its attention to the House of Representatives, agreeing with the dissenter on the three-judge district court, who had “relied on Baker v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Today, small rural states with less diverse populations benefit from state equality in the Senate. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The contract's merger clause precludes petitioner's reliance on communications between the parties and other extrinsic sources to support its proposed definition (see Schron v Troutman Sanders LLP, 20 NY3d 430, 436 [2013]). [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The contract's merger clause precludes petitioner's reliance on communications between the parties and other extrinsic sources to support its proposed definition (see Schron v Troutman Sanders LLP, 20 NY3d 430, 436 [2013]). [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 12:49 pm
This is clearly illustrated in the recent case of ERP Operating v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 11:17 am by Garrett Hinck
The Supreme Court stayed the Ninth Circuit’s September 7 decision in Hawaii v. [read post]