Search for: "Taylor v. United States"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2022, 10:22 pm
In the Ericsson v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 6:18 am
United States, 2016 U.S. [read post]
22 May 2024, 3:00 am
Taylor, 244 N.C. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:41 pm
See United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 8:57 am
Michigan Court of Appeals, in People v Killich, No. 329941, held that the Juvenile Code doesn’t allow for the imposition of a flat rate probation supervision fee, and vacated the trial court order imposing the fee and remanded for a corrected order of disposition.FACTS: Respondent Taylor Killich, a juvenile, pled no contest to a juvenile petition and was placed on probation for three months. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:36 pm
Taylor (Tribal Court Jurisdiction; Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act) Pollard, et al. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 3:37 pm
Pa. 2008); United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:11 pm
Facts: This case (EDMOND v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 7:39 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
" This failure, said the State, resulted in certain employees being identified in the stipulation as P S and T unit employees although they, in fact, continued to perform duties that are appropriately deemed managerial or confidential within the meaning of the Taylor Law.The Director denied the motion and, ultimately, PERB granted PEF's petition to the extent of placing the 250 positions in the P S and T unit. [read post]
14 May 2024, 4:17 pm
The standards for libel differ whether you are in Canada or the United States, so should one or the other decide to sue for libel, it would make a difference where they filed the lawsuit. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
These reductions in the State's "employer contributions for health insurance" were also applied to retired judges and other retired employees of the State as the employer notwithstanding the fact that such retirees were not in danger of suffering " layoff, salary freezes and unpaid furloughs" nor were they members of a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law [Article 14 of the Civil Service Law Article]. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 2:17 pm
In the coming weeks, the court is poised to issue a major ruling in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
United States, SCOTUS held that a person charged with a crime has standing to challenge the law under which she is charged on federalism grounds even though she is an individual, not a state. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:25 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:21 pm
TaylorIn Ideal Aerosmith Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 4:11 pm
For example, if the applicant abandons an application more that one year after the first public use or sale in the United States or the first publication of the invention, all rights to the invention in the United States are effectively abandoned because the application cannot be refiled. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:03 am
More to come.......5) United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 9:01 pm
United States (07-330), involving appellate judges’ ability to increase sentences sua sponte, and Irizarry v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 10:51 am
Those rules were set aside by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in May, 2017, in the published opinion Taylor v. [read post]
