Search for: "Thomas v. Marshall" Results 401 - 420 of 812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm by James Romoser
It was there that she met the civil-rights lawyer Thurgood Marshall. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Voting RightsThe Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am by admin
Humanitarian Law Project and Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Marshall Project, Andrew Cohen remarks that the cert petition in Williams v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am by Derek T. Muller
of Texas at Austin 1.18 $106,598 $90,100 V&erbilt Univ. 1.19 $129,030 $108,800 Univ. of Arkansas 1.19 $61,500 $51,700 Mitchell Hamline Sch. of Law 1.21 $64,429 $53,200 Univ. of California-Los Angeles 1.26 $121,453 $96,600 Univ. of North Dakota 1.26 $61,500 $48,800 Univ. of Kansas 1.27 $66,415 $52,100 Univ. of Kentucky 1.28 $69,860 $54,400 Univ. of Mississippi 1.32 $64,300 $48,700 The Univ. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
“Justice [John Marshall} Harlan specifically and correctly buried that argument years ago,” Stevens said, a reference to an opinion Harlan had written in 1961 in the case of Poe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
~Thomas Jefferson, 1789 To underscore these points, the Framers provided in Article V, not just one but two methods (and four paths) for amendment. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 11:11 am by Adam Feldman
One explanation by Professors James Spriggs and Thomas Hansford is ideological. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am by Mark Walsh
Marshal Gail Curley announces that court is in recess until next Thursday. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 5:00 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In the National Law Journal, Tony Mauro reports on Justice Clarence Thomas’s dissent from the denial of certiorari in Plumley v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 8:58 am by familoo
Thurgood Marshall to litigate it and humiliate the Kansas rednecks. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
It should be remebered that only Justice Thomas resorted to originalism in SFFA v. [read post]