Search for: "U. S. Appeal of" Results 401 - 420 of 6,704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2012, 6:15 pm by JT
Medical what he must do to comply with the provision of the Appellate Term’s order requiring a prompt application to the Board “Plaintiffs appealed from so much of the [...] [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 7:05 pm by Maureen Johnston
U-Haul Co. of West Virginia v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:10 am
Had the Court of Appeal not published this opinion, I would never have known that ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft "accounted for nearly 65% of all moving violations for driving in transit lanes and bicycle lanes, obstructing bicycle lanes and traffic lanes, failure to yield to pedestrians, and illegal U-turns in business districts" in San Francisco.That's a shockingly high number. [read post]
15 May 2010, 9:39 am by JT
., 2010 NY Slip Op 50829(U)(App. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:12 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
Minnesota Court of Appeals: An Apartment Door Handle and Lock are within the Home’s Curtilage This week, in case of first impression, the Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed a defendant’s serious drug conviction on the basis that law enforcement unlawfully intruded upon a constitutionally protected area: the defendant’s apartment door handle and lock. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:13 pm by By STEVEN M. DAVIDOFF
While the president's review of corporate taxation looked at the tax advantages of debt, it had no proposals to change the situation, probably because that would cause uncertainty and complications. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 6:44 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
“On appeal, though, this court held that all of Hines’s claims failed to state a claim. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 6:00 am
Last week's Daily Journal had a focus article called "Class Conflicts" (subscription), which addresses "no-class-action" arbitration clauses and the Court of Appeal's recent decision in Konig v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 6:00 am
U-Haul Co., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Dec. 19, 2006), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Five), held 2-1 that a "no class action" abitration provision in an employment contract was enforceable under Discover Bank v. [read post]