Search for: "UNITED STATES v. FRANCE"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,607
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2021, 11:26 am
Renault may not have intervened in all Nokia v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:54 am
(United States) Coty is a global cosmetic company. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 2:59 pm
Nicastro - decided by the United States Supreme Court three months after Russell came down. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
Germany of 6 September 1978, Malone v. the United Kingdom from August 2, 1984, etc.).58. interpretative value of the preamble is deeply rooted in countries with common law system ( common law ), Preamble to the Constitution embodying a guiding framework for constitutional interpretation.59. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm
“Hayuk’s work has been featured widely in popular online and print publications, such as The New York Times (United States), Huffington Post (United States), Juxtapoz Art & Culture Magazine (United States), Hypebeast (Hong Kong), Arrestedmotion (United States), Laughing Squid (United States), Web Urbanist (United States), NYLON Magazine (United States),… [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 2:57 pm
He remains wanted by the United States criminal justice system. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 7:11 am
See Everson v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 1:11 am
In the final chapter, May looks into the benefits of PDOs for different groups of stakeholders: producers, consumers, regional and state authorities. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:10 am
McNeil countered that consumers were not misled by its advertisements.The parties have engaged in various out-of-court disputes as well as this action and the two cases already settled, one in France and one in the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 3:44 am
The Court first reiterated that Article 10 protects ‘expressive conduct’, including expressive conduct which offends, shocks or disturbs the State or ‘any section of the population’. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:42 am
--Hamdi v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:31 am
by Dennis Crouch In WesternGeco v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
Amazon's trade mark travails in the USThe doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales] is a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm
The first case is United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:05 pm
See United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 4:41 am
” Bank of United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 2:04 am
Ellie Wilson brings you the story.CJEU: "Flat-rate" reimbursement for legal fees must cover a significant part of the costs incurred by the successful party In Case C-57/15 United Video Properties, the CJEU held that while Article 14 Enforcement Directive does not prohibit flat-rate reimbursement of legal costs per se, it sets limits on how Member States can set the flat-rate. [read post]
