Search for: "United States v. Nelson" Results 401 - 420 of 865
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
United States (seven). [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 3:46 pm by Lyle Denniston
” The new filing sought to rely heavily upon the favorable comments that the Supreme Court made about existing same-sex marriages two years ago in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am by Guest Blogger
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 7:27 am by Amy Howe
Hobbs, holding that Arkansas prison officials cannot prohibit a Muslim inmate from growing a half-inch beard, drew commentary from Dawinder Sidhu, who at Religion and Politics suggests that “[a] plausible claim can also be made that Holt foreshadows the end of affirmative action in the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:31 pm by Austin Nimocks
Also significant is the Sixth Circuit’s correct understanding of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-9972, concerning a similar issue. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Nelson is binding precedent as to petitioners’ constitutional claims. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am by Maureen Johnston
Nelson is binding precedent as to petitioners’ constitutional claims. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 3:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Louisiana couples’ lawyers, in urging the Supreme Court to take on their case now along with any of those it accepted from the Sixth Circuit, made four points in favor of early review of the Louisiana case: First, the judge’s decision in favor of the ban was the first in the nation to uphold a state ban in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
Nelson in 1972 and last year’s decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am by Adam Gillette
For reasons that I am too lazy to look up, the decision that the Supreme Court overturned is not from a Circuit Court of Appeals but from a panel of one judge from the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and two from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. [read post]