Search for: "United States v. Line Material Co."
Results 401 - 420
of 816
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
With all those caveats, in this brutally long post, I try to address the most significant questions that come before the Supreme Court, with an eye to the issues on which the Stevens retirement could realistically produce a material change in the law. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
Umbro's Delaware-based subsidiary handled its business in the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 11:19 am
From yesterday's decision in Matsumoto v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
If you would like to receive this update in an e-mail delivered to your inbox every Monday, please send an e-mail to subscribe@taberlaw.com with the word “subscribe” in the subject line. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:04 am
The case of Conrad v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Since then, subsequent additions to the official History of the Supreme Court of the United States have been famously unpunctual, uneven, and mostly unheralded. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:46 am
The plaintiff won on his co-inventorship claim for five of the seven patents but lost on all his state claims for damages. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:44 pm
The threshold for class certification in Canadian provinces is generally considered to be lower than in the United States. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
For example, it is inappropriate to ignore negotiated reductions to the final price.[25] But the contractor must establish that the negotiated reduction related to the same cost element as the undisclosed data.[26] The proposed price also is not the appropriate baseline where there have been material changes, such as new quantities or delivery schedules.[27] Additionally, the proposal price is not the appropriate baseline where there is evidence the Government relied on another analysis or… [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm
At all times material, plaintiff Jeffrey A. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
MEMC Electronic Materials Inc. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
However, interest in purchasing this type of insurance did not develop until 1939, when in New York Dock Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
The line-up of justices was therefore essentially the same as the 7-2 opinion in Eldred v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:13 am
When it comes to monitoring the personal emails of employees that are accessed on work devices, however, the line is not as clear. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
At the time of his alleged violation of the state’s civil rights statute, Colorado did not recognize same-sex marriages as a matter of state law, and the United States Supreme Court had said nothing to suggest that limiting marriage to a man and a woman was unconstitutional. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
United States, 136 S. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 4:16 pm
In Kelo v. [read post]
