Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 401 - 420
of 10,263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2017, 5:18 pm
As predicted, the United States has filed a cert petition and stay application in Trump v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 1:15 pm
On October 27, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) in Corcamore, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 11:01 pm
The delay question came up in passing in Footnote 3 of United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:52 pm
By: Mark Stepanyuk The United States led the world in internet usage throughout the 1990s and “[a]t the time of the Dot-com-crash less than 7% of the world was online. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:10 pm
Maker’s Mark Distillery, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 12:58 pm
Mayorkas "Plaintiff Mark Bristow, a United States citizen, has filed a Form I-130 petition for an immigrant visa on behalf of his husband, Plaintiff Felixberto Tinga Villamil II. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:23 am
Barclays Capital Inc. and Barclays PLC v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 4:07 am
Qurate Retail, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
See Iancu v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:52 am
Leonid Nahshin v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:31 pm
On September 3, 2010, IHOP IP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, the owner of various IHOP registered trademarks in the United States, sued the International House of Prayer alleging various trademark infringement theories. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 11:34 am
The United States Supreme Court held in Rodriguez v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 9:12 am
’s rights in the famous mark BARBIE were not enough to for our Supreme Court to find a likelihood of confusion with a restaurant operating under the name Barbie’s (Mattel, Inc. v. 3894207 Canada Inc., 2006 SCC 22). [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 2:28 pm
Tillett retained the right to use the KROMA mark in the United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:37 am
Today, as CNN reported, the United States Supreme Court rejected cert in the case Bogani Charles Calhoun v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:24 am
After the decision in Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:48 pm
United States, 10-cv-8435Read Entire NYLJ Article by Mark Hamblett here. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 7:05 am
[Plaintiff] therefore imports these products into the United States, and it was required to mark them under Section 287(a). [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:37 am
This concept used to exist under the United Kingdom's Trade Marks Act 1938; the Mathys Report on British Trade Mark Law and Practice, Cmnd 5601, May 1974, recommended scrapping it and it was indeed erased when the United Kingdom implemented the new, exciting norms of harmonised European national trade marks in its Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 2:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
