Search for: "United States v. Reed"
Results 401 - 420
of 974
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
Oracle v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 10:44 am
United States, No. 22-6023 (6th Cir. 2023) to highlight the difficulty posed by attempts to force the IRS’s hand in areas in which it hasn’t issued guidance, particularly on cryptocurrency. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 10:44 am
United States, No. 22-6023 (6th Cir. 2023) to highlight the difficulty posed by attempts to force the IRS’s hand in areas in which it hasn’t issued guidance, particularly on cryptocurrency. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 9:48 am
Also, because the clause lacks a definition of contractor, the letter cites United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
Practical Guidance Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Related Content Corporations across the United States are evaluating how they manage diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies in the workplace in light of the recent Supreme Court decision striking down affirmative action policies on the basis of race in education, ( Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:56 pm
Community for Creative Non-Violence (1984) (requiring that a facially content-neutral ban on camping must be "justified without reference to the content of the regulated speech"); United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 9:41 pm
They include two members of the still relatively new Supreme Court of the United Kingdom—the Right Honorable The Lord Mance and the Right Honourable Lord Reed. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 1:29 pm
United States so that you don't have to go insane. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 11:37 am
United States, 805 N.E.2d 798, 801 (Ind. 2004). [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:33 am
AFSCME and several state pension funds, including the nation's largest, the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), sent letters to the SEC in mid-November urging Cox to let the AFSCME v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:49 am
The Northern Ireland Act 1998 has therefore never really been regarded as something that can/should sustain a legally sovereign legislature, even if the Act has been described as a “constitutional statute” (see Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland [2002] UKHL 32). [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
He says Parliament may be prorogued for a number of purposes. 14:26: Lord Reed and Lady Arden question Lord Keen QC regarding procedural steps the Government would take in the event that prorogation is declared unlawful by the Court. 14:21: Lord Keen QC submits that “in any view” part 4 of the Interlocuter (the Inner Court’s order) must be recalled. 14:19 Lord Keen QC argues that in so far as the Inner House sought to declare the prorogation unlawful, he will take no issue… [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:01 am
Kayla Reed v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am
President Obama’s criticism of the Supreme Court’s recent Citizens United decision in Wednesday’s State of the Union address dominated the headlines yesterday and today. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
Hobby Lobby and Zubik v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:32 pm
Last month, Lindsey provided readers of the Drug and Device Law blog with an overview of United Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:39 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 5:35 pm
In Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:51 pm
United States that invalidated the Affordable Care Act’s remaining parts. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:33 pm
United States. [read post]
