Search for: "United States v. Stark" Results 401 - 420 of 776
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2023, 9:00 am by Dennis Crouch
”  Judge Stark rebuked the attorney here — stating that Pure Hemp should have requested an evidentiary hearing rather than simply appealing. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The petitioners have pulled together an experienced legal team, including Lord Anthony Gifford, counsel to the landmark case of Dudgeon v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 7:00 am by Marty Lederman
 (Attorney General Wirt for instance, opined in 1827 that the President could order the discontinuance of a “vexatio[us]” suit in the name of the United States if it was “wholly unfounded in law. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 8:21 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f), which authorizes the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:57 am
Note that this decision appears to stand in stark contrast to the 2008 decision in Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay, Inc., No. 04 Civ. 4607 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
30 May 2023, 8:10 am by Evan George
” The justices unanimously agreed on the judgment that the Sacketts should not have been subject to EPA authority, but there was stark disagreement over the majority’s reasoning for how to define the waters of the United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:10 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
United States Jaycees (1984), the Supreme Court said that the Constitution protects certain intimate relationships, like marriage. [read post]