Search for: "Word v. U. S"
Results 401 - 420
of 2,441
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2012, 9:28 pm
S. 204, 261 U. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:45 am
S. 323, 334, 348 (1974)); see also Bose Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:26 pm
Co. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 12:36 pm
The Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, recently held in Nguyen v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Dismissed employee precluded from litigating her termination because of her failure to exhaust her administrative remediesMatter of Yan Ping Xu v New York City Dept. of Health, 2009 NY Slip Op 50147(U), Decided on January 23, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County [Not officially published]Yan Ping Xu, a New York City Research Scientist Level I, a position in the non-competitive class, was terminated from her position. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 7:25 am
The case is Hetronic International, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 1:23 am
Cir. 2012); Adverio Pharma GmbH v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 12:19 pm
In Carney v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:03 am
One of those text messages stated, `If u value 1 delta place u will not want 2 threatn my masonic ties, kp n mind u hav famlw wit nice homez dont b foolish az u issue threatz 2 me Right On! [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:28 am
S. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:42 pm
XVI; Brushaber v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 3:19 pm
S. 367, 372 (1876); see McCulloch v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 4:18 pm
The court nonetheless stressed that use of a mark in a domain name as such may be sufficient for constituting genuine use - just not in this case because the public would consider the use of the word Zappa as a general descriptive reference and would not understand it as a reference to the trade mark owner.For an in-depth analysis of this case, this Kat recommends Guido Westkamp’s current intelligence note published in JIPLP: “Personality trade marks and their limits:… [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
King, 567 U. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:33 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 6:18 am
That was found to be the case in Erps v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:46 am
” 353 U. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:55 pm
Sierra Recycling & Demolition, Inc. v. [read post]
