Search for: "Young v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 8,036
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am by Frank Cranmer
There were difficulties in accessing the relevant rules for information-sharing and there were insufficient safeguards in relation to the proportionality of any interference with art 8 83-84]: confidential information concerning a child or young person’s state of health (such as contraception, pregnancy or sexually transmitted disease) could be disclosed to a wide range of authorities without either the young person or the parents being aware of the art 8… [read post]
12 May 2016, 2:51 pm by Stephen D. Rosenberg
My thoughts on that led to an article, titled “The Centre Barely Holds: ERISA Preemption After Gobeille v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by Kali Borkoski
Young; opinion author boxed in red. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 7:15 pm
Perles et al. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 4:00 am by Jeffrey Brown
Feel free to e-mail me if you have suggestions for an upcoming list.GPS / JonesThe Missed Opportunity of United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 1:18 pm
 Here's what the Court of Appeal says about it:"In Property Reserve v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:55 am by Richard Frank
State of Montana, in which a Montana trial court has ruled in favor of the young Montana climate plaintiffs. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:29 pm by Brian Shiffrin
United States, 208 F.3d 41, 44 (2d Cir.2000) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Boria v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 12:25 pm
New York State Division of Parole, Timothy Gutkaiss was serving a prison term for sodomy, stemming from an incident which reportedly involved his young nephew. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
On 18 February 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its much awaited judgment in the appeal of R v Jogee [2013] EWCA Crim 1433, which was consolidated with the Privy Council appeal of Ruddock v The Queen JCPC 2015/0020. [read post]