Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 13,855
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2022, 10:43 am
Appx. 868 (2d Cir. 2020) (unpublished) (affirming a lower court’s ruling that “officers had at least arguable probable cause to believe that plaintiffs had obstructed governmental administration” where plaintiffs “refus[ed] to open the door to their apartment” after officers informed them that a Family Court order, equivalent to a search warrant, authorized officers’ entry); People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 7:27 am
The court also found the companies in civil contempt for failing to comply with a discovery order (CFTC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 5:26 pm
§ 7A-66(6), provides that a D.A. may be removed by a court for “[c]onduct prejudicial to the administration of justice which brings the office into disrepute. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 4:35 pm
Fuji Photo v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
During World War II, he served as a naval intelligence officer. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:46 am
On April 27, 2010, the Court of Appeals published a per curiam opinion in Chelsea Investment Group LLC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:22 pm
The case is Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:23 am
For example, the Supreme Court of Arizona said last April in the case of State ex rel Montgomery v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:15 am
However, IRS Revenue Ruling 90-72 provides a limited administrative exception for certain payments that supplement state unemployment compensation, sometimes referred to as “SUB-pay. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 9:35 am
A 1995, Texas Supreme Court case styled, Harwell v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 7:45 am
In Lawson v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 2:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 7:06 am
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit2008),] an employee of a county probation office wrote a letter to a local Common Pleas judge, alleging that her supervisor was ineffective and had aired unprofessional opinions of probationers, whom he called `scum. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 7:30 am
" * Citing Matter of Ferrara v Magee Volunteer Fire Dept., 191 AD2d 967, the Appellate Division noted that §209-l "by its own terms, does not affect the right of members of any fire company to remove a volunteer officer or voluntary member of such company for failure to comply with the constitution and by-laws of such company". [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 7:30 am
" * Citing Matter of Ferrara v Magee Volunteer Fire Dept., 191 AD2d 967, the Appellate Division noted that §209-l "by its own terms, does not affect the right of members of any fire company to remove a volunteer officer or voluntary member of such company for failure to comply with the constitution and by-laws of such company". [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:05 pm
The bill also tears down the Supreme Court’s eBay v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 10:04 am
” The OFCCP states that the directive is intended to update federal policy to incorporate recent developments in the law articulated in Supreme Court decisions, including Burwell v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 9:22 am
In Lange v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
Schedule a free in-office consultation if you need experienced legal representation in a traffic/municipal court matter. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 9:08 pm
In the Eleventh Circuit case, Gil v. [read post]
