Search for: "Long v. United States" Results 4181 - 4200 of 20,241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2009, 7:07 am
” The case is United Student Aid Fund v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:05 am by Jon Sands
United States, 133 S. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Schmid, The Real Shariah Risk: Why the United States Cannot Afford to Miss the Islamic Finance Moment, (University of Illinois Law Review, Vol. 2013, No. 3, 2013).Davi S. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 11:40 am by Christine Nielsen
” In the United States, wiretapping and surveillance issues continue to appear before the U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
*A United States District Court judge granted the City’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Matthews had spoken as a public employee and not as a citizen and thus his speech was not protected by the First Amendment.Citing Cox v Warwick Valley Central School District, 654 F3d 267, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals said that the test it applied in cases in which a plaintiff asserts a First Amendment retaliation claim requires the plaintiff to establish that: (1)… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 7:16 pm
State of Indiana, decided 3-2 - "For the reasons explained in Membres v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
United States, No. 11-820 (Feb. 20, 2013).We've blogged about what I still believe to be the landmark decision of Padilla v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:36 am by Jonathan Hafetz
As it stands, district judges have no authority to order the release of a detainee to the United States even when it is the only remedy. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:23 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on August 9, 2012 released the following: "Part of Operation Eagle Eye United States Attorney Brendan V. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:23 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on August 9, 2012 released the following: "Part of Operation Eagle Eye United States Attorney Brendan V. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:42 pm by A. Brian Albritton
" Here, the Court essentially found that the false certification regarding minor breaches of the contract was not material to the government's decision to continue paying on the contract because the government continued to pay defendant on the contract long after the government knew of and defendant self-reported the violations.Defendant Black and Veatch was a large construction firm that contracted with the United States Agency for International Development… [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:08 pm by Lauren Connell
Thank you, Supreme Court of the United States, for resolving this very public controversy. [read post]