Search for: "C/T"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 50,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2015, 6:33 am
(B.4 (C)(1) & 23.109(c)(1)(i). [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 4:55 am
The ten principles themselves largely haven’t been changed, and this should not be a surprise. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:52 pm
Sentencia C-524 de 1995 (M.P. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:29 pm
Doesn't C-32 create exceptions that mean "anything goes"? [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:57 am
The T&C almost all say it’s a one-off gig, unpaid, no benefits, and usually don’t have information to follow up with participants. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 12:19 pm
The issue was in a case brought by AT&T, whether a corporation could be considered a person pursuant to Exemption 7(C) and therefore be provided “privacy” rights for its information under the exemption. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 11:36 pm
With this sort of express and direct partisan link, it doesn’t seem particularly surprising to raise eyebrows in a (c)(4) application to the IRS. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 11:09 am
The senators didn't mention USB-C but cited the EU's upcoming legislation that will require smartphones, digital cameras, e-readers, headsets, laptops, and some other consumer tech products with wired charging to use USB-C.Read 19 remaining paragraphs | Comments [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:01 pm
(c) Between the ears? [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:21 pm
S Corporations generally don’t owe tax. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 2:07 pm
§ 2255, he can't use 2255 again. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:56 am
That’s my “C” word in the bankruptcy alphabet. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 6:25 pm
Chris Dodd- C-: He behaved a lot like Biden but didn’t have the the same understated charm. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 11:57 am
Second, these infections aren't just hospital-acquired, or nosocomial, anymore. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:11 am
The FCC Bureau argued that while AT&T should be afforded some protection under §522(b)(4), the exemptions afforded under §522(b)(7)(C) should not be granted to AT&T because a corporation is not considered a person and therefore should not be conferred a benefit it is not owed. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:20 am
The high -wered counsel they have now employed do bill by the hour and don't come cheaply. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:31 pm
Law is a particularly powerful voice in this discourse b/c it speaks w/the power of the state. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 7:18 am
This is an interesting 512(c) ruling for at least reasons: * I can’t recall another 512(c) case where a corporation was the “user” who directed the defendant to store the material. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:12 pm
That Court annulled the decision in its judgment in Joined Cases T- 50/06, T-56/06, T-62/06 and T-69/06 Ireland and others v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
(c).)Secondary sources: McCormick on Evidence (7th ed. 2013) The Hearsay Rule, § 249, p. 189, fn. 2; Witkin, Cal. [read post]
